Chinese researcher names rare beetle species after Xi Jinping

The paramount Chinese leader Xi Jinping has many things dedicated to him: viral songs, paintings, orchids, jackets, museums and tablets marking his footprints. Now he can boast the latest item in this collection: a newly found beetle species that has been named after him.

Wang Chengbin, a 32-year-old Chinese entomologist at Czech Univesity of Life Sciences Prague, has recently decided to name a rare species of beetles after the Chinese leader ”for his leadership making our motherland stronger and stronger.”

The name of the beetle, Rhyzodiastes (Temoana) xii which can be loosely translated into Chinese as Xi’s Rhyzodiastes, soon went viral and became the latest target of ridicule online. Netizens suggested that naming a type of bug after the president was “hardly a good way of showing admiration.”

And the censorship apparatus seemed to agree with them. On Monday, Chinese reports about the new beetles finding were deleted and the beetle’s Chinese name  censored on Weibo.

However, Wang stood by his eye-catching naming decision. “It’s certainly an act out of respect,” Wang said, adding “as long as science exists, the name will forever exist. It’s a very rare species of beetles, and I would certainly appreciate it if people name it after me.”

“I’ve looked it up, while there isn’t any new species named after Chinese leaders, there are species named after US presidents and leaders of other countries. Researchers do name news species after their beloved leaders and my whole family admires president Xi,” Wang said, explaining the rationality behind the name.

While naming a new species after a Chinese leader is unprecedented, it’s not unusual for researcher and scientist to name their new findings after world leaders and celebrities.

A researcher at Alabama’s Auburn University has named a spider he found in California Aptostichus barackobamai, after the US President. Celebrities, including actress Angelina Jolie, U2 singer Bono and US civil rights activist Cesar Chavez, have all had spiders named after them.

Golden rice scandal undermines China’s GM food push

China has reportedly sacked three officials for testing genetically modified rice on school children without appropriate consensus, according to its state news agency Xinhua.

The trial, part of a Sino-US joint research, was designed to test the efficiency of the Golden Rice in alleviating vitamin A deficiency. However, it triggered great public outcry earlier this year when it was exposed that children involved in the trial had not been told the genetically modified nature of the Golden Rice.

Though the government was quick to initiate an internal investigation into the trial, in the hope to shift the blame to the compromised scientific ethics and academic integrities of the individuals, the latest development of the golden rice saga may prove fruitless in quelling the controversies of GMO researches in China.

Jiang Gaoming, a leading scientist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Botany and a vocal opposition to GMO commercialisation, said the Golden Rice trial was disgraceful.

“The reason why the public is so concerned about the genetically modified Golden Rice is because we all care for our health and the health of our children,” Jiang said, “the Golden Rice saga exposed that the vested interests have wilfully deceived the public and used innocent children for experiment in order to promote their products.”

However, his opponent on the issue, popular scientific writer Fang Zhouzi, feared that the anti-GM camp and the media will undermine China’s progress on GM technology by overreacting to the case and demonising GMO researches.

“On one hand, they repeatedly emphasise the fallacies of the experiment and the consequential punishment; one the other hand, they fail to mention that the harmlessness of the trial and the sound safe record of GMO food,” Fang said.

“After this case, not only Golden Rice would not likely to be introduced in China to help the children with vitamin A deficiency, but also other GMO researches and promotion of GMO food would face greater difficulties. (As a result,) the gap between China the developed countries, such as the US, in GM technology will enlarge,” he added.

Refuting Fang’s argument, Jiang said he himself supported GM researches strategically but “most researches carrying out at the moment are money-driven rather than national-technology-advancement-driven”.

China has made GM technology as its high-tech development priority and invested more than 21b into researches, according to the Greenpeace.

However, the NGO suggested that China should learn a lesson from the Golden Rice case and locate more founding to ecological agriculture as an alternative to increase food production.

You are more than welcome to read the Chinese version of this blog

Liu Futang’s case casts shadow on China’s environment commitment

China’s renowned environmental reporter Liu Futang was sentenced to a 3 year probation against the backdrop of the ruling Communist Party’s increasing emphasis on “Ecological Civilisation”.

The veteran environmentalist was found guilty by the local court in South China Hainan Province for “illegal business activities” and fined £1,700 last Wednesday.

The prosecutors claimed Liu had profited illegally from his self-publishing books despite that Liu gave away most of his books for free. The trial against Liu opened in October was believed to be a political retaliation as Liu’s books exposed environmental degradations caused by government-backed projects.

Wednesday’s conviction, came only weeks after 18th Party Congress’s high profile advocacy of building a “Ecological Civilisation”, is believed to effectively silence the vocal environmentalist.

The self-contradicted act has casted shadow on China’s environmental commitment and worried China’s green activists.
Feng Yongfeng, founder of the Beijing-based NGO Green Beagle, regretted that the judicial authorities in Hainan still misjudged local green activists’ intention.

“The judicial authorities in Hainan still badly underestimate local green activists’ role,” Feng said, “they have treated the people who care for the local environment most as the people who hate the local development most. They have tried every way to framed them.”

While Liu was being trialled, the construction of the government-backed power plant project which Liu had previously spoken against resumed, according to Radio Free Asia. The project near Yinggehai town has sparked a month-long conflict between local residents and the government in March.

A local resident told Radio Free Asia that the opposition had been muted by fear. “There’s nothing to be done…if you make a fuss they just put you down,” he said.

Not all local green activists are dejected by Liu’s conviction.

Liu Jianqiang, Chinadialogue’s Beijing Editor and veteran environmentalist, said “what the local officials do, such as convicting Liu Futang, does not necessarily mean that the party hierarchy’s advocacy of ‘Ecological Civilisation’ is an empty talk.”

“The party hierarchy has the determination to build an ecological civilisation,” he said, “they have just come into power, and they need time to carry out their ideas.”

Some even saw the silver lining in the case.

Feng Yongfeng said that Liu’s case had raised the public concern toward the Hainan’s environmental issues so that local green activists would keep exposing any future environmental destruction.

“The government may not necessarily have learnt the lesson, but the public certainly have,” Feng added.

Kidney trafficking case tried in Beijing

Local Procuratorate in Bejing has prosecuted 16 suspects of organ trafficking recently, the Beijing News reports.

The case involving organ traffickers and surgeons was described by an unnamed official as the biggest organised organ trafficking case in China’s history.

The traffickers conducted 51 kidney removal operations and the money involved in this case exceeded 10m Yuan (£1m).

Zheng Wei, the principal suspect of the case haired surgeons from Anhui Province in the name of a famous Beijing hospital.

Doctors usually arrived in the morning and left on the same day after 3 to 6 kidney removal operations.

Most operations were conducted at a hospital in Southeastern China Xuzhou city and a villa in Beijing during a 9 month period from March 2010 to December 2010.

The villa was dirty and poorly equipped according to the one of the suspect.

The traffickers first advertised online, and then contacted and arranged “donors” – people who were willing to sell their kidneys for money. After the kidney removal operation, each “donor” would be compensated from 20,000 Yuan (£2k) to 25,000 Yuan (£2.5k) for their kidney.

Most “donors” sold their kidney for economic needs and did not consider themselves as victims. Some of them even suggested the money-for-kidney conduct as a fair trade.

The kidneys removed were sold to uraemia patients in need of new kidneys

In 2010, Japanese television reported that a group of “transplant tourists” paid £50,000 to receive kidney transplant in China.

Organ trafficking is illegal under China’s laws. However, the great demand of organ transplant and the relatively loose penalty on organ trafficking results in the prosperity of organ black market.

For those who can read Chinese:

http://news.163.com/12/0301/02/7RFQT4FV00014AED.html

New-born baby abandoned in street found dead in NE China

I have never underestimated the inhumanity of people. Neither had I been prepared to see them display in parents for there is an ancient Chinese saying that “even a ferocious tiger will not eat its offspring.”

However, I had been so naively to believe in humanity which clearly did not exist in some people and be slapped in the face by the cruel reality.

Local newspaper in Harbin reported that an abandoned baby was found dead in the street yesterday. Witness said the baby boy was put in a plastic bag and thrown out from a car driving-by. When a passer-by saw the baby and he/she removed him to the roadside. But it was too late. The baby boy has already been rolled over by other cars not aware of his existence.

Needless to say, I was outraged by this tragedy as soon as I read the news. But then, a few moments later, the anger became sadness and reflection.

Though there is no report on who abandoned the baby and why he/she abandoned the baby on a busy road, I assume this inhuman act was done by the parents or the next of kin. They are the most reasonable yet unthinkable suspects. Reasonable, because they were possibly the only people who could access the new-born baby. Unthinkable, because they were the least impossible people you would expect them to conduct this coldblooded murder.

I mean, on what earth will the parents or the next of kin murder their own baby? And why!!!

I can only think of several possible reasons of the malicious act: a) the baby boy was a bastard and his parent(s) wanted to be rid of him for various reasons; b) the baby boy was not the first child of the family and the parent(s) in fear of huge sum of penalty for violating the One-child policy wanted to be rid of him for financial reason; c) the baby boy was born with some disease or disabilities that his family couldn’t afford the money for his medical treatment;

But never will there be a reason to justify the inhuman act.

China to tighten immigration policy

After opening door to welcome foreigners for decades, China is considering to tighten its border control.

A new entry and exit administration regulation which requires all foreigners to hold a valid work permits/work visas before working in China has been discussed by the standing committee of NPC on 26 December.

Under the new regulation, foreigners who are employed or paid for their work without work permits/work visas or undertake employment specified in the work permits as well as International students working outside their permitted hours will be deemed as undertaking illegal employment.

Foreigners found undertaking illegal employment could be repatriated and banned entry for five years.

Vice minister of the Ministry of the Public Security Yang Channing said the new regulation will reflect the country’s policy preference of encouraging high-end talents  to work in China and restricting unskilled workers’ entry.

A talent-importing-guideline which will adjust to the need of social economic development and the demand-supply of human resources will be published by the government under the new regulation.

China now has more than 230,000 foreign work permit holders, and experts believe that the actual number of foreign employees in China could be much higher.

for more information

http://news.163.com/11/1227/02/7M8FOJ5U0001124J.html

http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2011-12/27/c_122488977.htm

NK defectors to lauch newspaper in London

The first nonofficial North Korean newspaper is to come out in London in two weeks.

The new free newspaper titled FreeNK will be published weekly in both Korean and English, according to its publisher, the London-based North Korean Residents Society (NKRS).

The editor of the FreeNK Kim Song-ju said the Korean version will be distributed among North Korean defectors’ community worldwide while the English version will mainly be sent to British and European politicians and human right campaigners.

Kim Song-ju said the main content of the newspaper will be the press coverage of North Korea from international media and the country’s latest news from their own source in North Korea.

NKRS director Kim Joo-il said the FreeNK would be the first newspaper published by North Korean defectors.

“We hope the newspaper will raise people’s awareness of the current situation in the country and provide North Korean defector community with a platform to communicate,” Kim Joo-il said.

A special A4 size Korean version will be sent back to North Korea via brokers in China. Kim Joo-il hoped the newspaper would promote gradual political changes in North Korea.

Though the newspaper’s content will be the same as their website which was set up a few years ago, the editor Kim Song-ju said the newspaper would play a more important role as common people in North Korea could not access Internet.

“People in North Korea don’t know what the outside world looks like and they don’t know the wrongdoings of Kim Jong-il. If they have enough information, their minds will change and then they will not follow Kim,” Kim Song-ju added.

The UK has become the hub of North Korean campaigners in Europe. Some 581 North Korean defectors have been given asylum in the UK, according to UN High Commissioner for Refugees’ statics.

The story of a North Korean defector

From North Korea’s border co­unty Musan to the nearest Chinese city Yanji, the distance is merely 80 miles. It usually takes less than five hours if you drive and two days if you walk. But this short journey took Kim Song-ju more than 4 days.

With little food and no water, the 32-year-old North Korean man had only one thought in mind. “I can’t go back there (North Korea). I’d rather die if I’m caught.” He had just swum across the Tumen River, the natural boundary that separ­­ates the two neighbouring countries, China and North Korea. He was wet and exhausted.

The Tumen River is not wide. Neither is it deep. At its middle reach, the width of its narrowest point is less than 200 ft and the average depth around 4-10 ft. But conditions on the two banks differ greatly. On the Chinese side, thriving, busy and lively; on the North Korean side, decaying, dull and bleak.

Life comes full circle. Three or four decades ago, the situation was the other way around – many Chinese crossed the border to feed themselves. But Kim was too young even to remember the good old days. All he remembered was starvation and poverty.

Kim’s father died of starvation in 1995, the same year when famine began to spread in the country. Kim was in his early twenties then. The horrible images of people dying in starvation and the rumours of cannibalism haunted him ever since. He was always hungry and he was always insecure.

The dear leader was wrong. North Korea was no heaven.” He needed to get out of this dreadful land even at the cost of his life, he decided.

He has two sisters, and one had already escaped to South Korea then. He asked the one who stayed at home to take good care of their mother when he was away.

But his attempt had to be kept secret, not just for his own sake. At that time, the families of escapees could be put in prison and even prison camps as an indirect punishment.

Kim set out at night, carefully swimming across the Tumen River. He dared not paddle hard lest the noise would draw attention. Every time he heard something, he shivered. “The soldiers would shoot at anyone who tries to escape,” when he recalled his first escape several years later, it was still not difficult to sense the fear in his voice.

It was midnight. He had just crossed the border, wet and worn-out. But he could not rest. Darkness was his best cover. If the residents living near the border spotted him, he would be reported and repatriated.

He walked and walked and walked, till daybreak. Daylight was his worst enemy. It could easily expose him. He had to hide himself in the roadside bushes or fields nearby during daytime.

Hungry, thirsty and exhausted, he dared not ask for help. Residents along the China-North Korea border were told to report any suspicious people, and they got rewards for doing so.

Kim walked for four days before he got to Yanji, a city along the China-North Korea border where many Chaoxianzu (Chinese people of Korean descent) live.

The year was 2004, the first time Kim escaped from the world’s most mysterious regime.

Even though Kim spoke the same language as the local Chaoxianzu and learnt Chinese while he was working in Yanji, his appearance would instantly give him away. He was shorter and thinner, a result of long time malnutrition.

Like most North Korean defectors, he is wary of strangers. But unlike most of them, he is optimistic and outspoken at the same time. So when he was telling his story, sitting in his 300 sq ft south London office that he shares with two other North Korean defectors, he had not cried once, not even when he retold the terrible experience of being repatriated by Chinese police and imprisoned by North Korean police.

In 2005, a year after his successful escape, Kim was reported. The Chinese police arrested him and sent him to Tumen, another city along the China-North Korea border. They kept him there for three days, and then a bus came and picked up him along with 24 fellow North Koreans.

As the bus drove across the Tumen Bridge, a bridge over the Tumen River that connects China and North Korea, he had only one thought – he wanted to die – but he couldn’t, two Chinese police were watching them and he was handcuffed.

The bus journey was no more than 30 minutes, but it felt like an eternity. When they got to the other end of the Tumen Bridge, North Korean police were already waiting there. He was taken to Onsung, a remote village.

“Why did you go to China?” “When did you go to China?” “What have you done in China?” These are always the most common questions. Then, the police asked: “Do you believe in Christianity? Have you met any South Korean people in China?” Kim knew these two questions were the most dangerous ones. If wrongly answered, he would immediately be sent to a prison camp.

After the questioning, he was transferred to a labour camp in which he stayed six days and was interrogated by the same of questions again and again. Finally, he was sentenced to jail for one month, serving in a prison near his hometown Musan.

“I only cried once, and that’s when my mother came to visit me in the prison,” he said, striving hard to hold back emotions.

Now that he had seen the world outside North Korea, nothing could have kept him in the country. He crossed the border a second time only three months after his release. This time, he had better luck.

He stayed in Yanji for three year and met a South Korean Christian who later arranged for him to come to England.

Kim said he was scared when he first landed on British soil. “I didn’t speak the language then and I hadn’t seen people of different skin colours before,” he said, half-jokingly.

That was January 2008. His life totally changed afterwards.

Now he is the editor of the FreeNK website, a hub for North Korean defectors worldwide, which promotes human rights in North Korea. Currently, he and his two fellow North Korean colleagues are planning to launch a free newspaper for people in North Korea.

“People in North Korea don’t know what the outside world looks like and they don’t know the wrongdoings of Kim Jong-il. If they have enough information, their minds will change and they will not follow Kim,” he said, determinedly.

Being brave and optimistic is one thing, and being traumatised is another. When an NHS car went by, the siren fading in and fading out, Kim suddenly stopped talking.

“I still feel scared whenever I hear the siren. I still sometimes have nightmares about my life in North Korea and China.”

China’s new regulations could hinder investigative journalism, media veteran feared

Media veteran feared China’s new regulation on news reporting could stymie the country’s investigative journalism.

Internet activist and media veteran Wen Yunchao said: “the new regulation is not easily enforceable, but it can be used as a sharp sword to stymie the media. Stories like the Watergate, there could not be a second source.”

China’s press and publication regulating body recently published several new regulations on preventing false news and governing journalists.

The new regulations require journalists to produce more than two news sources when covering negative stories of the government and ban the use of unverified online or mobile information.

The new regulations also give authorities rights to revoke press cards of serious violators. Journalists who severely breach the regulation can be barred from working in media.

News outlets are required to make corrections and apologies for any false report, and serious violations could lead to the suspension or even the revocation of their license.

There are worries that the new regulations could violate the National Human Rights Action Plan (2009-2010) published in April this year by hindering journalists’ rights to report, criticize, comment and publish.

“The human rights action plan is for foreigner to read and can’t be taken serious,” Mr Wen said, later adding that “the current theme is tightening control.”

Mr Wen said the enforcing of the new regulations came as a result of the growing influence of the internet.

“The other background is that traditional media had now been led by the new media and had followed the new media too closely on reporting unexpected incidents,” he said, adding that the government thought the trend to be undesirable for the over-all harmony of the country.

The government has begun intensifying its control since this July’s high speed train crash accident, in which heated online public debates baffled the authority.

Deserters shot dead in NE China

Police confirmed three soldiers with heavy weaponry were shot dead and one was arrested, the People’s Daily website reported.

The four soldiers, identified as Lin Penghan, Yang Fan, Li Xinxin and Zhang Xiyan, escaped from a garrison stationed in northeast China Jilin Province were found in Liaoning, a neighbouring province.

The Daily Telegraph reported that the soldiers drove south “for at least eight hours, covering between 300 and 400 miles, before they were stopped by special forces on the motorway”.

They were said to be on their way to one of the soldiers’ hometown when being stopped by the police.

Rumor has it that the soldiers fired at the police during the arresting and alleged witness posted a picture showing some bodies beside a green and yellow taxi, but the local police have not confirm the firing.

Reports relating to the news widely circulated on the Internet and were later deleted from all major websites in China.

Local police launched a manhunt for the four soldiers that had stolen an automatic rifle and 795 bullets and warned local shops of possible rubbery.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.